It seems that little things people
don’t take seriously or think too long about are the things that are the most
complicated. No one ever thinks too deep into customer service calls. I mean
when you call your worrying about your own problems. Sometimes you might
occasionally realize that you keep getting an Indian speaker but you don’t
question it. You’re calling for your own reasons not anyone else’s anyway. No one is thinking of outsourcing when they
call up customer service but that’s where it is at.
I feel that the authors claim is
that Indians are being paid less for having their identity stripped by
outsourcing. She warrants her claim by using Betty’s interview and Arundhati Roy’s
quotes. Even when she talks about the pay I feel that it warrants her claim
Throughout Beth Dutt-Brown’s
article she used a passionate, disappointed tone but it was calm. Her tone
didn’t sound like she would have been yelling this at someone or was slamming
it in your face. The article sounded calm and personal. She seemed really passionate
and disappointed when she started talking about how Indians basically give up
their identity when they go into customer services. She doesn’t try to hide how
disappointed and unnerved she feels about the fact that Indians have to pretend
they are American or British and basically deny themselves just to please the
public. And I felt upset with her.
Americans have hard names that people can’t pronounce they don’t go around
having to create a whole new identity. I think that is violating a person’s right
like how are you going to sit there and tell them they have to change their
whole identity to accommodate the needs of people they will never see in their
life. That is basically making them ashamed of their own identity.
She
uses logos when she talks about the low pay that the Indians receive. Her whole
argument to me has pathos in it I feel like she is just beaming disappointment
and sounds really upset with what is happening to the Indians. She also builds
ethos when she talks about Betty whose name isn’t really Betty. I feel like she
does a good job of engaging the reader into this problem/struggle. I say this
because I was genuinely annoyed and upset for the Indians. I understand that
they need the money and low wages are supposed to be low but I feel that for
what they are sacrificing they should be paid more for. Also the fact that they
have to sacrifice their own self for people they will never meet is so
preposterous. For example when Betty was talking about the life she made up I’m
like who is going to sit on the phone with customer service and ask the person
about their credentials? Also the fact that they have to master British/American
accents is too much. They act like Indians can’t have jobs. America is a melting pot of cultures anyway it’s
not like the person would be that suspicious. Honestly to me after reading this it got me
really riled up.
I always enjoy your tone Steph! But I think you should save the first paragraph for the end. Like you’d be giving your final thoughts. In you’re somewhat thesis I think you should pull in one of those quotes that the author incorporated to make the analysis stronger. From there you could analyze the text and get into your initial points. Other than that, this was detailed and specific. You could have gone a little more in depth – meaning being more specific with your sentences. EX: “. She also builds ethos when she talks about Betty whose name isn’t really Betty.” Anywho, I really enjoyed this. I haven’t read the article in depth but these women are giving so much pathos and it makes me think about these customer service call centers more.
ReplyDeleteHi, Stephanie. I agree with Chyna. You have the right idea here--your best paragraph is where you talk about the workers surrendering their cultural identity, because you are combining WHAT the author is saying (they're surrendering identity) with HOW she is saying it (using pathos, etc.). That's what a good rhetorical analysis should do, so see if you can make your other paragraphs look like that. Does that make sense?
ReplyDelete